Edmondson Park Building
Inspections

Connections, bearing and the engineering drawing in Edmondson Park NSW

Most defect arguments are about tolerance, and tolerance arguments are slow. A connection that does not match the engineering is different, because it is a comparison rather than a judgement: the drawing shows one arrangement of members, brackets and bolts, and the frame has another. That finding was recorded twice on Austral frames, on two different jobs, six kilometres from here. Alongside it sat not enough bearing at an external lintel, a bottom plate discontinuous under a loadbearing and bracing wall, and a steel column simply not installed. Each of those is a fact rather than an opinion, and each is invisible after lining.

Fully licensed & accredited

  • NSW Fair Trading NSW Fair Trading
  • Australian Society of Building Consultants Australian Society of Building Consultants
  • Strata Community Association Strata Community Association
  • Building Dispute Practitioners Society Building Dispute Practitioners Society

A connection not matching the engineering was recorded twice, on two Austral jobs.

Bearing length is a specified number, so not enough bearing is measurable.

A bottom plate broken under a bracing wall interrupts the load path into the slab.

A steel column recorded as not installed is the plainest possible finding.

None of it can be verified once the plasterer has been.

More about Edmondson Park

Written by our local inspection team from work carried out in Edmondson Park. Licensed building practitioners.

Guides

Guides for Edmondson Park owners and buyers

All guides →

Book a building inspection in Edmondson Park

Instant online pricing for Edmondson Park, or contact the booking team.

FAQ

Connections, bearing and the engineering drawing in Edmondson Park NSW: common questions

How do I check this myself?

You need the engineering drawing and the patience to compare it to what is in front of you. That comparison is most of what a frame inspection is.

What if the builder says it is equivalent?

Then they should have it confirmed by the engineer who drew it, in writing. An equivalent detail is a legitimate answer; an assertion of equivalence is not.

Is this common?

Common enough that it is the first thing we look for on a frame, and it turned up on two separate Austral jobs in this corridor.

Get a Free Quote